Game plan

Tomas Martin Etcheverry v Roberto Carballes Baena

Every number combines what Tomas Martin Etcheverry does well with what Roberto Carballes Baena allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Tomas Martin Etcheverry wins, best of 3 66%90%: 37%–87% · best of 5: 69%

Serve points won 64.5% / 61.3% Tomas / Roberto · tour 63.4%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 68%serve 64.8% / 61.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Tomas Martin Etcheverry's record against Roberto Carballes Baena's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −2.4 on serve, −1.4 on return vs expectation (427 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Tomas	Roberto
Direction choice	−0.03 ±0.09 better than 49%	−0.06 ±0.09 better than 41%
Shot selection	+0.41 ±0.17 better than 87%	+0.14 ±0.19 better than 68%
Execution	+0.75 ±0.38 better than 90%	+0.70 ±0.38 better than 89%
Points left on the table	2.46 ±0.11 lower than 66%	2.61 ±0.12 lower than 48%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Structural compatibility

Expected edge per 100 rally shots from style alone: Tomas Martin Etcheverry +2.09, Roberto Carballes Baena +1.91. Each player's shot mix weighted by their own skill with each shot and by how much the other gives up against it. This is why some rankings gaps don't hold in a given matchup.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Tomas Martin Etcheverry serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Tomas wins	v Roberto	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	54%	76%	71%	73.7%±5.3	67% ▲
Body	11%	62%	62%	60.3%±12.1	0% ▼
T	35%	71%	75%	71.4%±6.8	33% ▼

Optimal v Roberto Carballes Baena: +0.8±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Tomas wins	v Roberto	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	44%	72%	73%	72.2%±6.2	38% ▼
Body	7%	60%	63%	59.1%±14.1	0% ▼
T	49%	73%	73%	74.5%±6.0	62% ▲

Optimal v Roberto Carballes Baena: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +2.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Roberto Carballes Baena serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Roberto wins	v Tomas	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	46%	68%	73%	67.3%±5.9	45%
Body	12%	56%	58%	51.2%±11.5	0% ▼
T	42%	72%	77%	74.4%±6.0	55% ▲

Optimal v Tomas Martin Etcheverry: +0.9±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Roberto wins	v Tomas	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	61%	63%	71%	60.6%±6.5	48% ▼
Body	15%	61%	64%	61.8%±10.9	14%
T	25%	63%	68%	58.5%±8.0	38% ▲

Optimal v Tomas Martin Etcheverry: +0.4±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving body every time would read +1.5 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Tomas Martin Etcheverry returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Roberto	Value
FH through the middle	50%	+4.3	+0.5	+1.6	+6.3±2.3
FH down the line	23%	+1.7	+1.3	−1.2	+1.8±4.3
FH crosscourt	19%	+5.5	−0.3	+3.3	+8.5±4.3
FH slice through the middle	6%	−4.2	−0.9	−0.6	−5.8±2.2
FH slice down the line	2%	−4.3	−1.4	+0.1	−5.6±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.7±3.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (491 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Roberto	Value
BH through the middle	42%	+6.4	−0.3	+1.3	+7.4±2.2
BH crosscourt	26%	+8.8	−2.0	+0.6	+7.4±3.2
BH down the line	16%	+4.2	−0.6	−1.0	+2.6±4.6
BH slice through the middle	7%	−4.2	−0.1	−1.2	−5.5±2.5
BH slice crosscourt	5%	+0.5	−1.3	−2.1	−2.9±2.9

Lean BH crosscourt: +3.0±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (415 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Roberto	Value
FH through the middle	54%	−3.5	+2.3	+0.4	−0.8±2.7
FH down the line	25%	−1.8	+3.8	±0.0	+2.1±4.6
FH crosscourt	21%	−0.2	−0.6	+0.8	±0.0±4.3

Lean FH down the line: +2.0±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (140 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Roberto	Value
BH through the middle	37%	−2.9	+1.8	+1.1	+0.1±2.4
BH crosscourt	29%	+1.0	+0.8	+0.6	+2.4±3.1
FH through the middle	14%	−2.9	−1.8	+0.4	−4.3±2.3
FH inside-out	10%	+1.0	−0.4	±0.0	+0.6±3.6
BH down the line	6%	−0.2	−0.8	−2.4	−3.4±4.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.4±2.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (334 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Roberto Carballes Baena returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tomas	Value
FH through the middle	48%	+4.3	+1.9	−1.0	+5.2±2.3
FH down the line	28%	+1.7	+2.6	−1.0	+3.3±4.1
FH crosscourt	10%	+5.5	+0.3	+0.5	+6.3±4.3
FH slice through the middle	9%	−4.2	−0.8	−1.7	−6.6±2.3
FH slice down the line	4%	−4.3	+1.3	+0.7	−2.2±2.6

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.0±4.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (452 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tomas	Value
BH through the middle	44%	+6.4	+0.1	+0.3	+6.8±2.4
BH crosscourt	37%	+8.8	+2.0	−2.2	+8.6±3.2
BH slice through the middle	9%	−4.2	+0.4	±0.0	−3.8±2.5
BH down the line	8%	+4.2	+0.4	−1.5	+3.1±4.6
BH slice crosscourt	3%	+0.5	−0.1	+0.2	+0.6±2.7

Lean BH crosscourt: +2.5±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (393 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tomas	Value
FH through the middle	45%	−3.5	+0.9	+0.1	−2.5±2.8
FH down the line	43%	−1.8	−0.8	+1.5	−1.0±4.7
FH crosscourt	13%	−0.2	+1.0	−0.7	+0.1±4.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.7±4.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (148 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tomas	Value
BH crosscourt	38%	+1.0	−0.9	−0.5	−0.4±2.9
BH through the middle	33%	−2.9	+0.9	+1.1	−0.9±2.3
FH inside-out	11%	+1.0	−0.1	+1.5	+2.3±3.6
FH through the middle	11%	−2.9	+0.9	+0.1	−1.9±2.3
BH down the line	4%	−0.2	−0.3	−0.8	−1.3±4.5

Lean FH inside-out: +2.9±3.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (297 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Tomas Martin Etcheverry

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · return +1	+6.4±3.5	+3.0	+3.4
FH to the middle · return +1	+4.7±2.6	+2.0	+2.6
FH to their backhand · serve +1	+4.2±2.6	+0.9	+3.3
BH to the middle · return	+4.1±1.8	+1.4	+2.7
FH to their forehand · rally	+4.1±1.8	+2.1	+2.0
FH to their backhand · rally	+3.1±1.8	+0.6	+2.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
BH slice to the middle · rally	−3.1±2.2	−2.1	−1.0
BH slice to their backhand · return +1	−0.8±2.7	−0.5	−0.3
BH to their forehand · return	−0.8±4.3	+0.5	−1.3
BH to their forehand · rally	−0.6±3.5	+1.1	−1.6
BH slice to their backhand · rally	−0.1±2.1	−1.8	+1.6

Roberto Carballes Baena

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · rally	+4.9±2.0	+2.9	+1.9
FH to the middle · rally	+3.8±1.6	+2.6	+1.1
BH to the middle · return +1	+3.5±2.4	+1.4	+2.0
BH to their forehand · rally	+3.3±3.3	+0.4	+2.8
FH to their backhand · rally	+3.1±1.7	+1.6	+1.5
BH to their backhand · rally	+3.1±1.4	+1.6	+1.5

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
BH slice to the middle · rally	−1.7±2.3	−1.4	−0.3
BH slice to their backhand · rally	−0.6±2.3	−1.8	+1.2
BH slice to their forehand · rally	−0.5±3.5	−0.7	+0.2
FH to their backhand · serve +1	−0.3±2.4	−0.9	+0.6
FH to their backhand · return	−0.1±3.2	−0.2	+0.1

Against Roberto Carballes Baena-like opponents

Tomas Martin Etcheverry v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	63.0%	36.8%
Players most similar to Roberto Carballes Baena	3	58.8%	34.0%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Mariano Navone, Novak Djokovic, Jaume Munar, Roberto Bautista Agut, Pedro Martinez, Bernabe Zapata Miralles, Pablo Andujar, Mikhail Kukushkin, Guillermo Coria, Sergi Bruguera. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.