Game plan

Tommy Haas v James Blake

Every number combines what Tommy Haas does well with what James Blake allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Tommy Haas wins, best of 3 31%90%: 8%–68% · best of 5: 27%

Serve points won 60.2% / 64.1% Tommy / James · tour 61.3%

Strengths only, no similarity priors 26%serve 59.1% / 64.1%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Tommy Haas's record against James Blake's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: +2.9 on serve, −0.8 on return vs expectation (2204 points); head-to-head: −1.8 on serve, +4.5 on return vs expectation (307 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

Career	Tommy	James
Direction choice	+0.12 ±0.07 better than 84%	+0.08 ±0.07 better than 78%
Shot selection	−0.59 ±0.12 better than 9%	+0.03 ±0.12 better than 56%
Execution	−0.02 ±0.38 better than 67%	−0.86 ±0.36 better than 30%
Points left on the table	2.57 ±0.14 lower than 52%	2.49 ±0.14 lower than 62%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Tommy Haas serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	Tommy wins	v James	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	38%	72%	76%	74.8%±4.6	51% ▲
Body	4%	62%	58%	55.9%±10.7	0% ▼
T	57%	69%	76%	71.1%±4.4	49% ▼

Optimal v James Blake: +0.3±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.9 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	Tommy wins	v James	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	53%	73%	69%	68.8%±4.6	66% ▲
Body	6%	57%	59%	52.7%±11.2	0% ▼
T	41%	66%	72%	65.3%±5.5	34% ▼

Optimal v James Blake: +0.5±0.6 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

James Blake serving

Deuce court

1st serve	Now	James wins	v Tommy	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	39%	68%	72%	67.3%±5.0	38%
Body	13%	64%	63%	63.4%±8.7	0% ▼
T	49%	75%	77%	77.3%±4.3	62% ▲

Optimal v Tommy Haas: +0.5±0.8 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +5.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serve	Now	James wins	v Tommy	Matchup	Optimal
Wide	51%	71%	79%	77.8%±4.1	64% ▲
Body	8%	58%	67%	61.5%±10.9	0% ▼
T	41%	70%	75%	73.3%±5.0	36% ▼

Optimal v Tommy Haas: +0.8±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +3.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Tommy Haas returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v James	Value
FH through the middle	42%	+4.3	+0.8	±0.0	+5.0±2.2
FH crosscourt	22%	+5.5	−0.4	−3.0	+2.1±3.9
FH down the line	17%	+1.7	+1.4	+0.8	+3.9±3.9
FH slice through the middle	12%	−4.2	+3.3	+1.0	+0.1±2.3
FH slice down the line	4%	−4.3	+1.0	+0.1	−3.1±3.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.0±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (729 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v James	Value
BH slice through the middle	38%	−4.2	+3.4	+0.3	−0.4±1.9
BH slice crosscourt	22%	+0.5	+4.2	+2.9	+7.7±2.6
BH through the middle	15%	+6.4	+3.0	+0.6	+10.1±2.4
BH slice down the line	9%	−8.4	+3.5	+1.3	−3.6±3.5
BH crosscourt	8%	+8.8	+2.1	−1.2	+9.8±3.4

Lean BH through the middle: +6.3±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (754 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v James	Value
FH through the middle	47%	−3.5	+1.2	+0.2	−2.0±2.6
FH crosscourt	25%	−0.2	−2.8	+6.0	+2.9±4.3
FH down the line	23%	−1.8	−1.3	+3.0	±0.0±4.4
FH slice through the middle	5%	−12.7	+1.3	+1.6	−9.7±1.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.6±3.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (204 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v James	Value
BH through the middle	28%	−2.9	−1.1	−0.8	−4.7±2.1
BH crosscourt	23%	+1.0	+0.6	−0.6	+1.0±2.7
BH slice crosscourt	20%	−4.0	+0.5	+1.3	−2.2±2.3
BH slice through the middle	13%	−11.3	−1.2	+1.3	−11.2±2.4
BH down the line	12%	−0.2	+1.5	−1.6	−0.3±4.8

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (585 returns charted)

James Blake returning

1st serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tommy	Value
FH crosscourt	38%	+5.5	+0.1	+2.5	+8.2±3.7
FH through the middle	34%	+4.3	−2.7	+0.2	+1.7±2.3
FH down the line	22%	+1.7	−0.6	−1.0	+0.1±3.8
FH slice through the middle	4%	−4.2	−0.6	+0.7	−4.1±2.2
FH slice crosscourt	1%	−4.3	+0.1	−1.1	−5.4±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.7±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (587 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tommy	Value
BH slice through the middle	25%	−4.2	+3.0	+2.3	+1.1±1.9
BH through the middle	25%	+6.4	−2.0	+0.8	+5.2±2.2
BH slice crosscourt	17%	+0.5	+4.2	+2.5	+7.2±2.5
BH crosscourt	16%	+8.8	−1.4	+3.3	+10.7±3.0
BH down the line	11%	+4.2	−0.1	+0.4	+4.5±4.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +6.1±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (875 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tommy	Value
FH through the middle	33%	−3.5	+0.9	+1.4	−1.1±2.6
FH crosscourt	31%	−0.2	+1.6	−0.8	+0.6±4.4
FH down the line	26%	−1.8	−0.5	−3.0	−5.3±4.5
FH slice through the middle	6%	−12.7	+1.1	±0.0	−11.6±1.3
FH slice down the line	3%	−9.4	−2.1	±0.0	−11.5±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +3.3±3.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (159 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

Return	Now	Tour	Own	v Tommy	Value
BH crosscourt	35%	+1.0	−3.3	−1.2	−3.5±2.6
BH through the middle	31%	−2.9	−0.2	+1.0	−2.1±2.0
BH down the line	17%	−0.2	+0.5	+1.7	+2.0±4.7
BH slice crosscourt	6%	−4.0	+0.4	−1.6	−5.2±2.5
BH slice through the middle	4%	−11.3	+0.4	−0.8	−11.7±2.3

Lean BH down the line: +4.3±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (545 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on clay. Each player's clay record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Tommy Haas

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH slice to the middle · return	+4.6±2.6	+3.0	+1.6
BH slice to their backhand · return	+3.1±2.8	+1.3	+1.8
BH slice to the middle · return	+2.3±2.3	+2.1	+0.2
FH to their backhand · return	+1.7±3.0	−0.2	+1.9
BH slice to the middle · rally	+0.6±2.6	±0.0	+0.6
BH slice to their backhand · serve +1	+0.6±3.2	−0.2	+0.8

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · return +1	−6.1±4.9	−5.0	−1.1
FH volley to their forehand · rally	−6.0±5.9	−0.3	−5.6
BH to their backhand · rally	−5.4±3.1	−3.5	−1.8
FH to their backhand · serve +1	−4.6±4.3	−3.6	−1.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1	−4.4±4.7	−2.6	−1.8

James Blake

Favour

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their forehand · return	+9.8±5.1	+8.4	+1.4
BH slice to their backhand · return	+7.6±3.3	+5.3	+2.3
BH volley to their backhand · rally	+5.6±5.7	−0.1	+5.7
BH slice to the middle · return	+4.5±2.4	+3.4	+1.1
BH to their backhand · return +1	+4.3±3.9	+1.4	+2.9
FH volley to their forehand · rally	+3.7±5.7	+0.6	+3.1

Avoid

Shot	Edge	Own	Theirs
FH to their backhand · return	−6.8±3.9	−1.9	−4.9
BH to their forehand · serve +1	−6.1±5.3	−0.9	−5.1
FH to their backhand · return +1	−5.0±4.6	−1.2	−3.8
BH to their backhand · return	−4.2±3.6	−2.5	−1.7
FH to their forehand · rally	−4.2±4.1	−3.0	−1.2

Against James Blake-like opponents

Tommy Haas v	Matches	Serve pts won	Return pts won
All charted opponents	–	61.6%	32.5%
Players most similar to James Blake	12	63.9%	29.7%
James Blake (charted head-to-head)	1	60.4%	40.6%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Stefanos Tsitsipas, Alexei Popyrin, Lucas Pouille, Kyle Edmund, Jo Wilfried Tsonga, Roger Federer, Philipp Kohlschreiber, Sebastien Grosjean, Jim Courier. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head

Tommy Haas v James Blake US Open R16 · Hard · 4 Sep 2007