RallyIQ

Game plan

Denis Kudla v Janko Tipsarevic

Every number combines what Denis Kudla does well with what Janko Tipsarevic allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Denis Kudla wins, best of 3 52%90%: 29%–75% · best of 5: 53%
Serve points won 64.5% / 64.1% Denis / Janko · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 47%serve 64.1% / 64.6%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Denis Kudla's record against Janko Tipsarevic's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (head-to-head: +7.2 on serve, +7.3 on return vs expectation (233 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerDenisJanko
Direction choice−0.13 ±0.09
better than 25%
−0.16 ±0.05
better than 19%
Shot selection−0.47 ±0.22
better than 12%
−0.19 ±0.10
better than 30%
Execution−0.61 ±0.59
better than 41%
−0.29 ±0.38
better than 53%
Points left on the table2.37 ±0.18
lower than 77%
2.48 ±0.08
lower than 64%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Denis Kudla serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowDenis winsv JankoMatchupOptimal
Wide31%77%78%81.6%±6.144% ▲
Body15%61%52%49.5%±12.52% ▼
T54%78%79%82.0%±5.754%

Optimal v Janko Tipsarevic: +1.7±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +5.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowDenis winsv JankoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%72%78%77.3%±6.861% ▲
Body11%65%56%57.4%±14.40% ▼
T41%66%76%70.8%±8.139% ▼

Optimal v Janko Tipsarevic: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +4.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Janko Tipsarevic serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJanko winsv DenisMatchupOptimal
Wide37%72%82%81.4%±6.147% ▲
Body8%63%61%60.4%±13.30% ▼
T56%75%77%77.6%±6.653% ▼

Optimal v Denis Kudla: +0.5±0.7 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +3.8 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJanko winsv DenisMatchupOptimal
Wide45%72%70%68.9%±8.243% ▼
Body11%62%55%53.7%±13.80% ▼
T44%71%75%73.4%±7.357% ▲

Optimal v Denis Kudla: +0.8±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +4.2 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Denis Kudla returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JankoValue
FH through the middle31%+4.3−1.4−0.7+2.2±2.7
FH slice through the middle24%−4.2+0.8+1.0−2.4±2.3
FH down the line16%+1.7+1.7±0.0+3.4±4.2
FH crosscourt14%+5.5−0.6+0.7+5.6±4.2
FH slice crosscourt10%−4.3+0.9−0.6−4.0±2.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +4.7±3.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (164 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JankoValue
BH crosscourt32%+8.8+1.4−1.3+8.9±3.6
BH through the middle26%+6.4+1.9+0.2+8.5±2.6
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2+1.0+1.8−1.4±2.3
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5−1.9−1.8−3.2±2.8
BH slice down the line9%−8.4−0.6+0.4−8.6±3.2

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.2±2.6 per 100 returns v the current mix (142 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JankoValue
FH through the middle66%−3.5+1.5+1.2−0.8±2.6
FH down the line22%−1.8+2.0−1.5−1.3±4.1
FH crosscourt12%−0.2+0.6−0.2+0.2±3.6

Lean FH through the middle: ±0.0±1.4 per 100 returns v the current mix (41 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JankoValue
BH through the middle47%−2.9−0.6+0.7−2.8±2.3
BH crosscourt38%+1.0−0.8−1.3−1.0±3.0
BH down the line15%−0.2±0.0+0.3+0.1±4.5

Lean BH down the line: +1.8±4.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (107 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Janko Tipsarevic returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DenisValue
FH through the middle51%+4.3+0.2−0.3+4.1±2.7
FH down the line20%+1.7−1.2−0.6−0.1±4.4
FH crosscourt16%+5.5−2.9−3.3−0.7±4.4
FH slice through the middle8%−4.2−0.2−0.4−4.8±2.3
FH slice down the line3%−4.3−2.1±0.0−6.4±1.9

Lean FH through the middle: +2.8±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (476 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DenisValue
BH through the middle39%+6.4+1.7+0.4+8.5±2.6
BH crosscourt21%+8.8+1.9+2.7+13.4±3.4
BH slice through the middle17%−4.2−1.1+3.4−1.9±2.5
BH slice crosscourt11%+0.5−1.8−0.5−1.7±3.0
BH down the line8%+4.2±0.0−0.3+4.0±4.1

Lean BH crosscourt: +7.7±3.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (460 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DenisValue
FH through the middle54%−3.5+1.4+0.6−1.5±2.9
FH down the line29%−1.8−1.1+0.9−2.0±4.3
FH crosscourt17%−0.2−0.9−2.3−3.3±4.2

Lean FH through the middle: +0.5±2.0 per 100 returns v the current mix (135 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv DenisValue
BH crosscourt44%+1.0+0.8−0.7+1.1±3.2
BH through the middle40%−2.9+1.9+0.8−0.1±2.4
BH down the line9%−0.2+0.7−2.6−2.2±4.7
BH slice through the middle4%−11.3−1.2+0.4−12.1±1.9
BH slice crosscourt3%−4.0−1.7±0.0−5.7±1.3

Lean BH crosscourt: +1.5±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (278 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Denis Kudla

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · serve +1+3.3±3.7+1.9+1.4
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.1±3.5+0.7+2.4
BH to their backhand · return +1+2.5±4.3+3.0−0.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.2±4.3−0.2+1.4
BH to the middle · return+1.1±2.8+0.7+0.4
BH to their backhand · serve +1+0.7±4.3+0.1+0.6

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their forehand · rally−7.5±5.0−6.2−1.4
FH to their backhand · rally−3.6±3.4−2.3−1.2
BH to their forehand · serve +1−3.3±6.8−0.6−2.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1−1.9±5.3−3.9+2.0
BH to their backhand · return−1.9±3.8+1.0−2.9

Janko Tipsarevic

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+2.9±5.9+2.6+0.3
BH to their backhand · serve +1+2.1±4.0+0.8+1.3
FH to the middle · return+1.7±3.2+0.9+0.8
BH to the middle · return+1.6±2.7+2.3−0.7
BH slice to the middle · return+1.6±3.6−2.3+3.8
BH to the middle · rally+1.2±2.5−0.1+1.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return−7.4±6.5−0.9−6.5
FH to their backhand · rally−5.2±3.5−2.2−3.0
FH to their backhand · serve +1−2.3±4.3−1.2−1.2
FH to the middle · rally−2.2±2.5+0.3−2.5
FH to their forehand · rally−1.7±3.3−1.2−0.4

Against Janko Tipsarevic-like opponents

Denis Kudla vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–62.2%33.1%
Janko Tipsarevic (charted head-to-head)1 70.9%43.1%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Alex De Minaur, Gael Monfils, Taro Daniel, Andreas Seppi, Viktor Troicki, Paolo Lorenzi, Marcos Baghdatis, Nicolas Almagro, Marat Safin. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head