RallyIQ

Game plan

Tommy Robredo v Albert Costa

Every number combines what Tommy Robredo does well with what Albert Costa allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Tommy Robredo wins, best of 3 42%90%: 15%–74% · best of 5: 40%
Serve points won 60.0% / 61.6% Tommy / Albert · tour 63.4%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 50%serve 60.9% / 61.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Tommy Robredo's record against Albert Costa's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −9.9 on serve, −9.3 on return vs expectation (267 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerTommyAlbert
Direction choice−0.20 ±0.15
better than 15%
+0.24 ±0.14
better than 97%
Shot selection−0.06 ±0.19
better than 47%
+0.14 ±0.18
better than 69%
Execution−0.15 ±0.50
better than 60%
+0.35 ±0.54
better than 81%
Points left on the table2.83 ±0.23
lower than 28%
2.18 ±0.14
lower than 94%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Tommy Robredo serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowTommy winsv AlbertMatchupOptimal
Wide46%70%72%69.7%±8.846%
Body17%59%65%60.3%±13.24% ▼
T37%71%73%68.6%±8.850% ▲

Optimal v Albert Costa: +0.1±1.0 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving wide every time would read +2.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowTommy winsv AlbertMatchupOptimal
Wide55%64%70%60.8%±8.342% ▼
Body15%61%57%55.4%±15.114%
T31%65%75%68.9%±10.044% ▲

Optimal v Albert Costa: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +6.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Albert Costa serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowAlbert winsv TommyMatchupOptimal
Wide42%67%76%70.2%±7.955% ▲
Body12%68%61%65.6%±13.50% ▼
T46%71%79%75.0%±7.545%

Optimal v Tommy Robredo: +0.7±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.1 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowAlbert winsv TommyMatchupOptimal
Wide64%64%72%63.1%±7.661% ▼
Body10%57%60%53.7%±15.10% ▼
T26%69%69%66.4%±10.239% ▲

Optimal v Tommy Robredo: +0.6±0.9 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix, inside the 90% margin. Serving T every time would read +3.3 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Tommy Robredo returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−2.0−0.7+1.5±3.0
FH crosscourt22%+5.5−3.2+0.5+2.8±4.4
FH down the line16%+1.7−3.5+3.3+1.5±4.5
FH slice through the middle14%−4.2+0.2+0.4−3.6±2.0
FH slice crosscourt8%−4.3+2.0±0.0−2.3±1.9

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.2±3.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (318 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
BH through the middle27%+6.4+2.6−2.4+6.6±2.7
BH slice through the middle23%−4.2+0.9+2.3−1.0±2.5
BH crosscourt19%+8.8−2.4−2.2+4.2±3.5
BH slice crosscourt13%+0.5+0.7+3.1+4.3±3.0
BH down the line10%+4.2+0.9+1.1+6.2±4.5

Lean BH through the middle: +3.8±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (398 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
FH crosscourt35%−0.2+1.4+3.5+4.6±4.0
FH through the middle30%−3.5±0.0+1.8−1.7±2.7
FH down the line22%−1.8+2.5+1.1+1.8±4.4
FH slice through the middle14%−12.7−1.1±0.0−13.8±1.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.0±2.9 per 100 returns v the current mix (88 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv AlbertValue
BH through the middle30%−2.9−0.7−1.4−5.0±2.5
BH crosscourt20%+1.0−1.6−0.6−1.2±3.2
FH inside-out17%+1.0+1.6+1.1+3.7±3.6
FH through the middle15%−2.9+0.8+1.8−0.3±2.4
FH inside-in8%+0.6−0.4+3.5+3.6±4.0

Lean FH inside-out: +4.9±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (359 returns charted)

Albert Costa returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
FH through the middle45%+4.3−0.5+2.8+6.6±2.8
FH down the line27%+1.7−0.8+1.2+2.0±4.3
FH crosscourt21%+5.5+0.1−0.8+4.9±4.3
FH slice through the middle7%−4.2−0.9+1.4−3.7±2.0

Lean FH through the middle: +2.3±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (104 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
BH slice through the middle23%−4.2+0.2+0.5−3.5±2.5
BH crosscourt23%+8.8−1.1+1.3+9.1±3.2
BH through the middle21%+6.4−1.0−0.2+5.2±2.5
BH slice crosscourt17%+0.5+1.2+3.9+5.6±3.0
BH down the line9%+4.2+0.8−0.3+4.7±4.4

Lean BH crosscourt: +5.8±2.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (189 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
FH crosscourt58%−0.2−1.3+3.9+2.4±4.4
FH through the middle26%−3.5+0.7−3.4−6.2±2.7
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.2+0.2−1.3±4.1

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.8±2.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (57 returns charted)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv TommyValue
BH crosscourt27%+1.0−0.6−0.6−0.2±3.1
BH through the middle22%−2.9−0.6−0.6−4.1±2.5
FH inside-out16%+1.0−0.3+0.2+0.9±3.6
FH through the middle15%−2.9−0.3−3.4−6.6±2.3
FH inside-in9%+0.6−2.1+3.9+2.3±4.0

Lean FH inside-out: +2.5±3.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (150 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average.

Tommy Robredo

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return+3.6±3.8+0.1+3.6
BH to their backhand · serve +1+3.4±3.1+0.5+2.9
FH to their forehand · rally+1.8±2.5+1.2+0.5
BH to their backhand · rally+1.0±2.1−0.2+1.2
FH to their backhand · rally+0.7±2.3−0.3+1.0
FH to the middle · rally±0.0±2.2−0.1+0.2

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH to their backhand · return−3.5±3.0−2.0−1.5
FH to their forehand · serve +1−2.4±3.7−0.6−1.7
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.3±3.3−1.0−1.4
BH to their forehand · rally−2.1±4.1−0.3−1.8
FH to their backhand · return +1−1.7±3.9−1.1−0.6

Albert Costa

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their forehand · return +1+5.7±4.1+6.5−0.7
FH to their forehand · serve +1+3.2±3.7+4.1−0.9
FH to their backhand · rally+3.0±2.3+1.7+1.3
BH to their backhand · return+1.6±2.9+0.3+1.3
FH to their backhand · return +1+1.3±3.8−0.2+1.5
FH to their backhand · serve +1+1.2±3.0−0.6+1.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to the middle · rally−2.6±2.3−1.9−0.7
BH to their backhand · serve +1−2.3±3.3−0.7−1.6
BH to their backhand · return +1−2.2±3.2+0.6−2.8
BH to the middle · rally−2.1±2.0−1.3−0.9
BH to their forehand · rally−0.6±3.7−1.2+0.5

Against Albert Costa-like opponents

Tommy Robredo vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–58.3%34.3%
Players most similar to Albert Costa2 50.0%25.2%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Thiago Seyboth Wild, Rafael Nadal, Hugo Dellien, Fernando Verdasco, Juan Carlos Ferrero, Carlos Moya, Alex Corretja, Magnus Norman, Sergi Bruguera. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.