RallyIQ

Game plan

Casper Ruud v Jo Wilfried Tsonga

Every number combines what Casper Ruud does well with what Jo Wilfried Tsonga allows, each measured against the tour average and shrunk toward it when the sample is thin. Flip perspective

Forecast

Casper Ruud wins, best of 3 44%90%: 34%–54% · best of 5: 42%
Serve points won 66.1% / 67.4% Casper / Jo · tour 63.8%
Strengths only, no similarity priors 37%serve 66.2% / 69.0%

Each player's serve and return strength is fitted against every opponent they were charted against, so a record built on weak opponents counts for less. At least one of them is no longer active or has too little charted in the last three seasons, so both are compared on their careers. The result is then nudged by Casper Ruud's record against Jo Wilfried Tsonga's tactical lookalikes and in their charted head-to-heads (lookalikes: −1.8 on serve, +4.7 on return vs expectation (879 points); head-to-head: +2.8 on serve, +5.6 on return vs expectation (295 points)). A game-by-game Markov chain turns point odds into match odds; the 90% range covers the uncertainty in the two strengths, not the nudges. Charted matches lean toward big events, so treat this as a scouting estimate, not a betting line.

Head to head, per 100 shots

CareerCasperJo
Direction choice−0.03 ±0.05
better than 49%
+0.19 ±0.05
better than 94%
Shot selection−0.02 ±0.09
better than 51%
+0.38 ±0.10
better than 85%
Execution+0.87 ±0.19
better than 93%
−0.52 ±0.35
better than 44%
Points left on the table2.68 ±0.08
lower than 40%
2.46 ±0.07
lower than 67%

Each player's career against an average tour player in the same position, adjusted for opponent strength, with a 90% margin (shots clustered by match). Points left on the table is the gap to the best-value direction for the same stroke, so lower is better. Percentiles are within each player's own tour. A side is highlighted only when the gap is larger than the margin on the difference.

Serve plan

The share of points the server wins when a first serve lands in that direction (hover a rate for its 90% interval; ± is the 90% margin). "Matchup" combines the server's rate with how this returner handles that serve. "Optimal" is the mix that wins most against this returner once they start reading a habit, at the response measured across the tour, and only within the range servers' habits actually vary. The gain over the current mix is how exploitable that mix is.

Casper Ruud serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowCasper winsv JoMatchupOptimal
Wide48%75%75%76.8%±2.644% ▼
Body9%64%68%68.2%±5.30% ▼
T43%78%74%76.3%±2.656% ▲

Optimal v Jo Wilfried Tsonga: +0.6±0.5 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +1.0 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowCasper winsv JoMatchupOptimal
Wide52%71%72%70.0%±2.846% ▼
Body7%60%69%67.0%±6.40% ▼
T41%72%74%73.7%±3.254% ▲

Optimal v Jo Wilfried Tsonga: +0.7±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +2.4 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Jo Wilfried Tsonga serving

Deuce court

1st serveNowJo winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide45%73%73%73.5%±2.739% ▼
Body7%61%63%60.0%±6.70% ▼
T48%80%74%78.8%±2.561% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.8±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving T every time would read +3.6 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Ad court

1st serveNowJo winsv CasperMatchupOptimal
Wide52%77%71%75.5%±2.745% ▼
Body5%63%62%62.5%±7.70% ▼
T42%75%73%75.5%±2.955% ▲

Optimal v Casper Ruud: +0.5±0.4 per 100 first serves (faults included) over the current mix. Serving wide every time would read +0.7 per 100 first serves in before the returner adjusts.

Return plan

Value of each return, in points per 100 returns against an average return of the same serve (direction, court, surface): the tour's result with that return, the returner's own edge with it, and what this server gives up when it comes back to that side. Returns with no charted direction are left out, so values compare with each other rather than with zero. Depth isn't a choice here: missed returns have no depth. Serve quality isn't charted, so a block through the middle partly reflects the serve that forced it.

Casper Ruud returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
FH through the middle37%+4.3+0.7+0.4+5.4±1.5
FH slice through the middle27%−4.2−0.7+0.4−4.5±1.7
FH down the line13%+1.7+1.2+1.4+4.2±3.1
FH crosscourt11%+5.5−1.3−2.1+2.1±3.2
FH slice down the line8%−4.3+1.5−1.7−4.5±2.9

Lean FH through the middle: +4.3±1.2 per 100 returns v the current mix (2447 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
BH through the middle44%+6.4+1.2−0.4+7.3±1.4
BH crosscourt31%+8.8+2.4−0.9+10.3±2.0
BH slice through the middle10%−4.2−1.7−2.3−8.3±1.8
BH down the line8%+4.2+3.2+0.7+8.2±3.6
BH slice crosscourt5%+0.5−0.7−0.4−0.5±2.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.4±1.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (3085 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
FH through the middle48%−3.5+1.8+0.6−1.1±2.0
FH crosscourt30%−0.2+1.1+0.1+1.0±3.6
FH down the line16%−1.8+0.8−2.0−3.0±4.0
FH slice through the middle5%−12.7+0.2±0.0−12.5±2.1
BH through the middle1%+0.1+0.3+0.6+1.0±1.2

Lean FH crosscourt: +2.4±2.8 per 100 returns v the current mix (709 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv JoValue
BH crosscourt31%+1.0+0.4+0.2+1.6±1.7
BH through the middle25%−2.9−1.2+0.6−3.5±1.4
FH through the middle17%−2.9−0.2+0.6−2.4±1.6
FH inside-in10%+0.6+2.1+0.1+2.7±3.6
FH inside-out9%+1.0−1.6−2.0−2.7±2.9

Lean FH inside-in: +3.7±3.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (2232 returns charted)

Jo Wilfried Tsonga returning

1st serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH through the middle36%+4.3−0.5+0.8+4.6±1.5
FH crosscourt23%+5.5−0.6+2.7+7.6±2.8
FH slice through the middle15%−4.2+1.3−1.0−3.9±1.8
FH down the line15%+1.7+0.9−3.0−0.3±3.1
FH slice crosscourt7%−4.3−2.2−0.3−6.8±2.8

Lean FH crosscourt: +5.5±2.3 per 100 returns v the current mix (1365 returns charted)

1st serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH through the middle29%+6.4+0.7+0.7+7.8±1.3
BH crosscourt21%+8.8−0.3−0.3+8.2±1.9
BH slice through the middle21%−4.2+2.0−1.0−3.2±1.6
BH slice crosscourt14%+0.5+3.2−1.1+2.6±2.3
BH down the line9%+4.2+1.5−0.4+5.3±3.5

Lean BH crosscourt: +4.3±1.7 per 100 returns v the current mix (1899 returns charted)

2nd serve to the forehand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
FH crosscourt37%−0.2+1.4−4.0−2.8±3.6
FH through the middle33%−3.5−0.2+0.4−3.2±2.2
FH down the line16%−1.8±0.0−1.8−3.6±4.2
FH slice through the middle8%−12.7−1.4−0.7−14.8±2.3
FH slice down the line2%−9.4−2.0−0.5−11.9±2.3

Lean FH crosscourt: +1.5±2.5 per 100 returns v the current mix (345 returns charted, inside the 90% margin)

2nd serve to the backhand

ReturnNowTourOwnv CasperValue
BH through the middle29%−2.9−2.7±0.0−5.6±1.4
BH crosscourt28%+1.0±0.0−1.0+0.1±1.8
BH down the line9%−0.2−5.8+3.4−2.6±4.0
FH through the middle8%−2.9−1.2+0.4−3.6±1.9
FH inside-in8%+0.6−2.2−4.0−5.6±3.7
FH inside-out7%+1.0+1.1−1.8+0.3±3.2

Lean FH inside-out: +4.0±3.1 per 100 returns v the current mix (1222 returns charted)

Rally plan

Edge, in points per 100 shots: the hitter's skill with the shot (own) plus how much the receiver usually gives up against it (theirs), both measured against the tour average on hard. Each player's hard record is shrunk toward their all-surface one, so a thin sample on it moves the numbers only a little.

Casper Ruud

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH to their backhand · return +1+6.2±3.0+3.9+2.2
FH volley to their backhand · rally+5.6±7.1+2.6+3.0
FH slice to the middle · rally+4.7±3.4+1.6+3.0
BH to their forehand · return +1+4.5±4.5+4.4+0.1
BH to the middle · serve +1+3.8±2.3+2.6+1.1
BH to their forehand · rally+3.1±2.8+3.9−0.8

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
BH volley to their backhand · rally−5.5±7.0−1.4−4.1
BH slice to their forehand · rally−4.2±3.8+0.6−4.8
BH slice to the middle · return−4.0±2.1−1.7−2.3
FH to their forehand · return−2.9±3.5−0.3−2.7
FH volley to their forehand · rally−2.0±6.5−1.3−0.7

Jo Wilfried Tsonga

Favour

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
Smash to their forehand · rally+5.7±5.2+3.6+2.1
FH volley to the middle · rally+5.6±8.2+2.2+3.3
FH slice to the middle · return +1+4.5±3.8+3.4+1.2
BH slice to their backhand · return+2.4±2.7+1.4+1.0
FH to their forehand · serve +1+2.1±2.1+0.7+1.4
FH to their backhand · serve +1+2.0±1.8+2.1−0.1

Avoid

ShotEdgeOwnTheirs
FH volley to their forehand · serve +1−6.8±7.8−7.5+0.7
BH slice to the middle · return +1−5.3±2.6−2.4−2.9
BH slice to their forehand · rally−5.0±4.0−1.3−3.7
BH volley to their backhand · rally−4.8±6.5−4.1−0.6
BH drop shot to their forehand · rally−4.4±7.3−6.7+2.3

Against Jo Wilfried Tsonga-like opponents

Casper Ruud vMatchesServe pts wonReturn pts won
All charted opponents–66.3%36.7%
Players most similar to Jo Wilfried Tsonga5 65.4%38.1%
Jo Wilfried Tsonga (charted head-to-head)1 70.4%40.3%

Similar by tactical fingerprint: Joao Fonseca, Hubert Hurkacz, Alexei Popyrin, Dominic Thiem, Lucas Pouille, Lloyd Harris, Kyle Edmund, Sam Querrey, Roger Federer, James Blake. When two players have rarely met, their records against these lookalikes fill the gap.

Charted head-to-head